Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Choose an application
Choose an application
God --- Proof, Ontological --- Anselm, --- 1 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- Filosofie. Psychologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- 1 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS Filosofie. Psychologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- Ontological argument --- Ontology --- God - Proof, Ontological --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 - Proslogion
Choose an application
In A Historical Study of Anselm's Proslogion , Toivo J. Holopainen offers a new overall interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion by providing an historical explanation for the distinctive combination of argument and devotion that this treatise exhibits. Part 1 clarifies Anselm’s outlook on the central arguments in the treatise by offering a careful analysis of the ‘single argument’, the discovery of which Anselm announces in the preface. Part 2 reassesses the conflicting views about faith and reason in the immediate background of the Proslogion (the Eucharistic controversy, the publication of the Monologion). Part 3 examines the Proslogion from a rhetorical perspective and argues that applying the ‘single argument’ in a devotional setting constitutes a subtle attempt to affect the audience’s ideas about method in theology.
Anselm, --- Devotion --- 2 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- 2 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS Godsdienst. Theologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- Godsdienst. Theologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 - Proslogion --- God --- Ontological argument --- Ontology --- Proof, Ontological.
Choose an application
Natural theology --- Anselm of Canterbury --- God --- Dieu --- Proof, Ontological --- Existence --- Preuve ontologique --- Anselm, --- -Metaphysics --- Misotheism --- Monotheism --- Religion --- Theism --- Anselm Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury --- -Proof, Ontological --- Ontological argument --- Ontology --- Anselme de Cantorbéry (Saint) / et Dieu. Existence. --- Anselmus van Canterbury (Hl.) / en God. Bestaan. --- God - Proof, Ontological --- Anselme, Saint --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 - Proslogion
Choose an application
Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109 CE), in his work Proslogion, originated the "ontological argument" for God's existence, famously arguing that "something than which nothing greater can be conceived," which he identifies with God, must actually exist, for otherwise something greater could indeed be conceived. Some commentators have claimed that although Anselm may not have been conscious of the fact, the Proslogion as well as his Reply to Gaunilo contains passages that constitute a second independent proof: a "modal ontological argument" that concerns the supposed logical necessity of God's existence. Other commentators disagree, countering that the alleged second argument does not stand on its own but presupposes the conclusion of the first. Anselm's Other Argument stakes an original claim in this debate, and takes it further. There is a second a priori argument in Anselm (specifically in the Reply), A. D. Smith contends, but it is not the modal argument past scholars have identified. This second argument surfaces in a number of forms, though always turning on certain deep, interrelated metaphysical issues. It is this form of argument that in fact underlies several of the passages which have been misconstrued as statements of the modal argument. In a book that combines historical research with rigorous philosophical analysis, Smith discusses this argument in detail, finally defending a modification of it that is implicit in Anselm. This "other argument" bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.
Logic --- Natural theology --- Theory of knowledge --- Anselm of Canterbury --- God --- Ontology --- Modality (Theory of knowledge) --- Proof, Ontological --- Early works to 1800 --- Anselm, --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Metaphysics --- Misotheism --- Monotheism --- Religion --- Theism --- Being --- Philosophy --- Necessity (Philosophy) --- Substance (Philosophy) --- Proof, Ontological&delete& --- Anselm --- Anselmus Cantuariensis --- Anselme d'Aoste --- Anselme de Cantorbéry --- Anselmus van Canterbury --- Anselmus --- Anselmus, --- Anzelm, --- Anselmo, --- Anselme, --- Ansèlm, --- Anshelmus, --- God - Proof, Ontological - Early works to 1800 --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109. - Proslogion
Choose an application
God (Christianity) --- God --- History of doctrines --- Proof, Ontological --- Anselm, --- 1 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- -God --- -Metaphysics --- Misotheism --- Monotheism --- Religion --- Theism --- Filosofie. Psychologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- -Anselm Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury --- Proof, Ontological. --- 1 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS Filosofie. Psychologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- -Filosofie. Psychologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- -1 ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS Filosofie. Psychologie--ANSELMUS CANTUARIENSIS --- Ontological argument --- Ontology --- God (Christianity) - History of doctrines - Middle Ages, 600-1500 --- God - Proof, Ontological --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 - Proslogion
Choose an application
Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109 CE), in his work Proslogion, originated the "ontological argument" for God's existence, famously arguing that "something than which nothing greater can be conceived," which he identifies with God, must actually exist, for otherwise something greater could indeed be conceived. Some commentators have claimed that although Anselm may not have been conscious of the fact, the Proslogion as well as his Reply to Gaunilo contains passages that constitute a second independent proof: a "modal ontological argument" that concerns the supposed logical necessity of God's existence. Other commentators disagree, countering that the alleged second argument does not stand on its own but presupposes the conclusion of the first. Anselm's Other Argument stakes an original claim in this debate, and takes it further. There is a second a priori argument in Anselm (specifically in the Reply), A. D. Smith contends, but it is not the modal argument past scholars have identified. This second argument surfaces in a number of forms, though always turning on certain deep, interrelated metaphysical issues. It is this form of argument that in fact underlies several of the passages which have been misconstrued as statements of the modal argument. In a book that combines historical research with rigorous philosophical analysis, Smith discusses this argument in detail, finally defending a modification of it that is implicit in Anselm. This "other argument" bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.
God --- Ontology. --- Modality (Theory of knowledge) --- Knowledge, Theory of --- Being --- Philosophy --- Metaphysics --- Necessity (Philosophy) --- Substance (Philosophy) --- Misotheism --- Theism --- Proof, Ontological --- Anselm, --- Anselm --- Anselmus Cantuariensis --- Anselme d'Aoste --- Anselme de Cantorbéry --- Anselmus van Canterbury --- Anselm of Canterbury --- Anselmus --- Anselmus, --- Anzelm, --- Anselmo, --- Anselme, --- Ansèlm, --- Anshelmus, --- God - Proof, Ontological - Early works to 1800 --- Ontology --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109 --- Anselm, - Saint, Archbishop of Canterbury, - 1033-1109. - Proslogion
Listing 1 - 8 of 8 |
Sort by
|