Narrow your search

Library

KU Leuven (7)

UCLouvain (7)

KBR (2)

LUCA School of Arts (2)

Odisee (2)

Thomas More Kempen (2)

Thomas More Mechelen (2)

UAntwerpen (2)

UCLL (2)

UGent (2)

More...

Resource type

book (8)


Language

English (6)

French (1)

Latin (1)


Year
From To Submit

2020 (1)

2014 (2)

1986 (1)

1978 (1)

1976 (1)

More...
Listing 1 - 8 of 8
Sort by

Book
De Anselmi Cantuariensis proslogio et monologio dissertatio historico-critica
Author:
Year: 1832 Publisher: Lipsiae: Haack,

Proslogion II and III : a third interpretation of Anselm's argument.
Author:
ISBN: 9004034366 9789004034365 Year: 1972 Publisher: Leiden Brill


Book
An introduction to Anselm's argument
Author:
ISBN: 0877221332 9780877221333 Year: 1978 Publisher: Philadelphia (Pa.): Temple university press


Book
A historical study of Anselm's Proslogion
Author:
ISSN: 24684333 ISBN: 9789004423206 9004423206 9789004426665 9004426663 Year: 2020 Volume: 2 Publisher: Leiden Boston

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

In A Historical Study of Anselm's Proslogion , Toivo J. Holopainen offers a new overall interpretation of Anselm’s Proslogion by providing an historical explanation for the distinctive combination of argument and devotion that this treatise exhibits. Part 1 clarifies Anselm’s outlook on the central arguments in the treatise by offering a careful analysis of the ‘single argument’, the discovery of which Anselm announces in the preface. Part 2 reassesses the conflicting views about faith and reason in the immediate background of the Proslogion (the Eucharistic controversy, the publication of the Monologion). Part 3 examines the Proslogion from a rhetorical perspective and argues that applying the ‘single argument’ in a devotional setting constitutes a subtle attempt to affect the audience’s ideas about method in theology.

La preuve de Dieu : introduction à la lecture du Proslogion de Anselm de Canterbury
Author:
ISBN: 2711609286 9782711609284 Year: 1986 Volume: vol *100 Publisher: Paris Vrin


Book
Anselm's other argument
Authors: ---
ISBN: 9780674725041 0674725042 Year: 2014 Publisher: Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109 CE), in his work Proslogion, originated the "ontological argument" for God's existence, famously arguing that "something than which nothing greater can be conceived," which he identifies with God, must actually exist, for otherwise something greater could indeed be conceived. Some commentators have claimed that although Anselm may not have been conscious of the fact, the Proslogion as well as his Reply to Gaunilo contains passages that constitute a second independent proof: a "modal ontological argument" that concerns the supposed logical necessity of God's existence. Other commentators disagree, countering that the alleged second argument does not stand on its own but presupposes the conclusion of the first. Anselm's Other Argument stakes an original claim in this debate, and takes it further. There is a second a priori argument in Anselm (specifically in the Reply), A. D. Smith contends, but it is not the modal argument past scholars have identified. This second argument surfaces in a number of forms, though always turning on certain deep, interrelated metaphysical issues. It is this form of argument that in fact underlies several of the passages which have been misconstrued as statements of the modal argument. In a book that combines historical research with rigorous philosophical analysis, Smith discusses this argument in detail, finally defending a modification of it that is implicit in Anselm. This "other argument" bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.


Book
Anselm's other argument
Author:
ISBN: 0674726855 0674726006 9780674726000 9780674725041 0674725042 Year: 2014 Publisher: Cambridge, Massachusetts

Loading...
Export citation

Choose an application

Bookmark

Abstract

Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109 CE), in his work Proslogion, originated the "ontological argument" for God's existence, famously arguing that "something than which nothing greater can be conceived," which he identifies with God, must actually exist, for otherwise something greater could indeed be conceived. Some commentators have claimed that although Anselm may not have been conscious of the fact, the Proslogion as well as his Reply to Gaunilo contains passages that constitute a second independent proof: a "modal ontological argument" that concerns the supposed logical necessity of God's existence. Other commentators disagree, countering that the alleged second argument does not stand on its own but presupposes the conclusion of the first. Anselm's Other Argument stakes an original claim in this debate, and takes it further. There is a second a priori argument in Anselm (specifically in the Reply), A. D. Smith contends, but it is not the modal argument past scholars have identified. This second argument surfaces in a number of forms, though always turning on certain deep, interrelated metaphysical issues. It is this form of argument that in fact underlies several of the passages which have been misconstrued as statements of the modal argument. In a book that combines historical research with rigorous philosophical analysis, Smith discusses this argument in detail, finally defending a modification of it that is implicit in Anselm. This "other argument" bears a striking resemblance to one that Duns Scotus would later employ.

Listing 1 - 8 of 8
Sort by